LOW CARBON FOOTPRINT ALUMINIUM COMPONENTS FOR E-MOBILITY

Authors

  • Elisa Fracchia Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Polytechnic of Turin, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7610-5197
  • Claudio Mus Endurance Overseas, Regione pozzo 26, 10034 Chivasso, Torino, ITALY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36547/ams.30.1.1997

Keywords:

Aluminium, High Pressure Die Casting, Aluminium Scrap, AlSi9Cu3(Fe), E‐mobility, Recycling

Abstract

In the fast-evolving E‐mobility transformation, the circular economy is one of the key factors to make Europe carbon neutral by 2050, together with sustainability, achievable only with a synergic approach, from raw material choice to recycling, through product design for re‐purposing. Secondary aluminium alloys have a twenty times lower carbon footprint than primary metals, leading to significant CO2 savings. Their properties can satisfy engineering targets through optimized product design. Adopting a smart system layout, in which functions are assigned to assemblies, some of the low‐end mechanical properties of secondary alloys can be offset. Design for easy disassembling can then guarantee a selective re‐purposing and, finally, an environmentally friendly recycling of components. Innovative products in this field have been developed and successfully produced by means of an optimized high-pressure die casting (HPDC) technology, adopting low carbon footprint raw materials supplied in alternative to ingot format. In this work, the characterization of a component for e-mobility has been conducted, evaluating both the characteristics of the scrap alloy used to produce the castings and the casting itself. The results demonstrate a fine and high-quality microstructure of the casting, proving the feasibility of the production process using exclusively scrap alloy.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-25

How to Cite

Fracchia, E., & Mus, C. (2024). LOW CARBON FOOTPRINT ALUMINIUM COMPONENTS FOR E-MOBILITY. Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 30(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.36547/ams.30.1.1997