Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica provides a forum for the publication of original papers in biotechnology, environmental and food chemistry. Papers dealing with agro- and food biotechnology, molecular biology and genetics of environmentally important microorganisms, bioinformatics, environmental biotechnology and chemistry, bio/analytical chemistry, medical chemistry, chemometrics in environmental, pharmaceutical and food analysis will be especially appreciated.

Ethical Guidelines for Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica

In order to ensure that works published in Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica are reliable and meet the ethical standards expected by the global scientific community, we have developed the following code of ethics to support editors, authors and peer reviewers in understanding the standards of behaviour they should follow in performing their roles in the journal publishing process.



  • The editors of Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica accept and evaluate submitted manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, nationality, ethics origin, political philosophy, religious belief or sexual orientation of the authors.
  • Editors must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Editors decide whether manuscripts will be accepted, rejected or need to be revised prior to acceptance. The publishing decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's reviewers. Editors can reject manuscript at any stage of reviewing process in case the manuscript does not meet the qualitative or formal standards of the journal.
  • Unpublished manuscripts or materials must not be used in an editor’s own research.
  • Editorial assistance to authors is free of charge; editors can have no benefit from publication of any manuscript. Editors should pass manuscripts in which they have potential conflicts of interests to another member of the editorial board to review and consider.


  • Authors declare in Letter to the Editor (or within e-mail) that paper is their own, original and unpublished work.
  • Authors guarantee that the manuscript has not been copied or (self)plagiarised (in whole or in part). Manuscripts should contain sufficient details and all relevant references to allow reproducibility of the work.
  • Authors guarantee that the results are presented in the manuscript clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image-based manipulation).
  • All used information resources (phrases, data, images, …)  must be properly cited or quoted.
  • Affiliation (all authors/co-authors) and corresponding address  (main author) must be clearly stated
  • Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages should be explained in detail by authors; the complete agreement with signatures of all authors will be required by editors in this case. Changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript.
  • Authors should include information on sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on the welfare of animals if the research involved animals.
  • Corresponding authors ensure all contributors have approved the final version of the manuscript and its submission to the journal.
  • When authors recognize an error or inaccuracy in own published work, it is their obligation to notify the Editor-in-Chief and cooperate with the editor to correct or retract the paper.


  • The Reviewers must treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents.
  • The Reviewers must keep confidential all information/ideas obtained during the peer review process and must not use them for personal advantage.
  • Review of manuscripts should be conducted objectively and politely but strictly and rigorously.
  • Suggestions and comments of Reviewers should be supported with arguments.

The Paper Review Process in Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica

All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two qualified, independed experts in the field, and by the Editorial Board members. Reviewers are aware of the identity of the authors, but authors are unaware of the identity of reviewers. The review process takes up to 4-6 weeks, and ends up with a review report and decision (acceptance, required revision or rejection) that will be delivered to corresponding author. Editors latter communicate with authors, as required, and indicate the necessary amendments to improve the quality of the paper. Editors believe that authors will find the reviewers' comments constructive, helpful and will consider using them to revise their work. The revised papers are sent to the reviewers for evaluation again.

The manuscripts are accepted for publication by the Editor in Chief.

Papers considered by the Editor in Chief as clearly below the standards of the journal, out of the journal´s scope or not in the required NBC form, are rejected without review. Authors who receive rejection letters should be aware that editorial boards are highly selective in their decision process to maintain the high editorial quality and citation rate.

The Review process follows the Ethical Guidlines for Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica available in Supplementary Materials.


Instructions for authors

These instructions apply to manuscripts submitted for publication in the Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica. It is important that authors follow the manuscript instructions carefully. The text, tables and figures have to be in one document. The Instructions are available in Supplementary Materials,  Please, download and read them before submitting your work.


Submitting a manuscript to Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica

All documents should be in Microsoft Word format (any other electronic version will be discarded without notice). Authors should submit an electronic version of their manuscript to Editorial office e-mail:



Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, License and all rights remain with the author.